![]() ![]() Precinct, located at 14 7 0 East New York A venue, Brooklyn, Newĭefendant Triscritti is sued in his individual and officialġ5. Time relevant herein, a Police Detective under Tax Reg. Police officer employed by the NYPD and as such was acting inĪgent, servant and employee of the City of New York. Defendant Detective Salvatore Triscritti ("Triscritti") was, Defendant Munoz is sued in her individual andġ4. Munoz was, at the time relevant herein, a Police Detective underĩ06360 in the 73rd Precinct, located at 14 70 East New York A Relevant, a police officer employed by the NYPD and as such wasĬapacity of an agent, servant and employee of the City of New Defendant Detective Elena Gonzalez-Munoz ("Munoz") was, at Is sued in his individual and official capacities.ġ3. Relevant herein, a Police Detective under Tax Reg. Servant and employee of the City ofNew York. Defendant Detective Marcelo Luc ("Luc") was, at all times Parks is sued in his individual and official capacities.ġ2. Located at 1470 East New York Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11212. Servant and employee of the City of New York. Officer employed by the NYPD and as such was acting in the Personnel obey the laws of the United States and the State ofNewġ1. The rules of the NYPD and FDNY, and for ensuring that the NYPD In addition, at all times here relevant, Defendant City was Supervisory officers as well as the individually namedġ0. Personnel, including police officers, detectives, fire marshals, Training, supervision, discipline and retention and conduct of "FDNY"), was responsible for the policy, practice, supervision,Ĭonduct of all NYPD and FDNY matters and was responsible for the At all times relevant hereto, Defendant City, acting throughĭepaiiment (or "NYPD") and the Fire Department of the City ofNew The Defendant City of New York (or "the City") is a municipalĩ. Occurred within the boundaries of the Eastern District. York is located within and a substantial part of the events Venue is laid within the Eastern District ofNew York in that (4), 1367(a) and the doctrine of pendant jurisdiction.Ħ. The jurisdiction of this court is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. This action arises under the Fomih and Fourteenth AmendmentsĬonstitution and under 42 U.S.C. Well as an award of costs and attorneys' fees, and such otherĤ. Plaintiff seeks monetary damages (compensatory and punitive) Moore's case was dismissed and sealed on, or about,įollowing a criminal trial, where Mr. Incarcerated for over seventy (70) months, until all charges As aĭeprived of his liberty and suffered physical injuries. Subsequently prosecuted and charged with two (2) counts ofĭegree and one (1) count of Arson in the Fourth Degree. The claim arises from an Octoincident in whichĬolor of state law, unlawfully arrested and detained Mr. §1988 for the violation of his civil rightsįourteenth Amendments, in addition to violations of the Laws ofĢ. This is a civil rights action in which Plaintiff seeks reliefĪnd 42 U.S. Plaintiff, Christopher Moore, by his attorney, Samuel C.ĭePaola, LLP, for his complaint against the above Defendants,ġ. Jane Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently Individually and in their official capacities (the names John and HANSEN and JOHN and JANE DOE 1 through 10, JOHN HERBERT įIRE MARSHAL JOHN ORLANDO FIRE MARSHAL CONSTANTINE KANELOPOULOS įIRE MARSHAL ERICH. MARCELO LUC DET.ĮLENA GONZALEZ-MUNOZ DET. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Moore was subsequently prosecuted and charged with two (2) counts of Murder in the Second Degree and one (1) count of Arson in the Fourth Degree. The claim arises from an Octoincident in which defendants, acting under color of state law, unlawfully arrested and detained Mr. §1988 for the violation of his civil rights protected by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, in addition to violations of the Laws of the State of New York. This is a civil rights action in which Plaintiff seeks relief through 42 U.S.C. DePaola, Esq., of Sim & DePaola, LLP, for his complaint against the above Defendants, alleges as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. 19-cv-542 Plaintiff, Christopher Moore, by his attorney, Samuel C. )( COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND ECF CASE Docket No. HANSEN and JOHN and JANE DOE 1 through 10, individually and in their official capacities (the names John and Jane Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown), Defendants. ![]() JOHN HERBERT FIRE MARSHAL JOHN ORLANDO FIRE MARSHAL CONSTANTINE KANELOPOULOS FIRE MARSHAL ERICH. ![]() Case 1:19-cv-00542 Document 1 Filed 01/29/19 of 21 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -)( CHRISTOPHER MOORE, Plaintiff, -against- CITY OF NEW YORK DET.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |